At present, the system of justice delivery at the grassroots level is fraught with contradictions; the current situation calls for reform in both civil and criminal fields due to delays in justice, corruption, fairness, non-professional attitudes and obstacles to justice. Of course, the rate of conversion of the accused through criminal trials is extremely low due to non-standard interrogation and prosecution, and the reduction of judges,
As well as the reduction of judges’ standards and the ongoing training and lower level judicial system. Not to be adorned with modern letters, the civilian system seems to sit still because the cases Will you go to court for years, we gave them tens must not, under any reform, but this time could not be discussed in Parliament prsyrhasl aurhuyy also came between political purposes and was not fruitful. Laws are made only after debate and through the Law and Justice Commission
What United Kingdom also corrected defects in the civil system through Wolf Reforms in ,
The United Kingdom also corrected defects in the civil system through Wolf Reforms in 1995, introducing a case management system that involved the registration of cases with the latest sources through a single court in a county or town / district. ۔ Developed an automated system to complete all of these proceedings in six months, set certain conditions before the case, the possibility of compromise before the trial, and introduced a system for this and set out the requirements for small and medium and large cases.
To use alternative means of achieving justice (ADR), the entire chapter of the Alternative Dispute Resolution, which resolved cases without reconciliation, compromise and reconciliation and without consent, was reached between the two parties. Not even such reforms have passed, even if our rural system of panchayat works on the same principle. I was but we have not been here nor for some time, India for a while
Why are te pakistan legal measures need to be reformed by providing information technology support on a regular basis?
In Pakistan, a research in 2018 revealed that more than 18 million cases are pending in Pakistani courts. Legal experts estimate that the average verdict of a case does not take months, and it takes more than 10 years, with the total number of judges in the Supreme Courts being lower than the average. According to the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s research, data from January 2018 show that the reason for the delay in the decision of cases in the Supreme Court is the main reason for the shortage of judges and the pressure on the judges. Has to deal with 150 to 200 cases a day, which is practically impossible, while in recent years, the trend of lawyers’ strike also delays the decision of the cases.
About ten at the end of December 2017 in Punjab. Millions of civil and family cases have yet to be decided and there are only 938 judges to deal with them. That means a judge is looking at more than 1000 cases. According to the Law and Justice Commission’s recommendations, the number of civil and family cases needs to be increased to about 2000, in order to improve the situation. A judge is responsible for 500 cases, but critics say that increasing the number of judges can improve matters without bringing wholesale reform to the system? Is this solution temporary or does constitutional and legal measures need to be reformed by providing information technology support on a regular basis?
Can Increase Improve Matters? Is this solution temporary or does constitutional and legal measures need to be reformed by providing information technology support on a regular basis? Can Increase Improve Matters? Is this solution temporary or does constitutional and legal measures need to be reformed by providing information technology support on a regular basis?
In view of Pakistan’s criminal system, its infrastructure has made mistakes and the disease is chronic. Pakistan is passing the country through its military courts with the approval of parliament. But this arrangement is temporary, like Dimik. Licking errors have paralyzed the system that needs to be fixed. The standard trail has become a dream and it requires national thinking and national steps to make that dream a reality. Judging by the judicial trail, no one has confirmed justice in Pakistan’s short history without getting into politics.
From 1956 to 2017, people have been complaining to Justice Munir Khan that in the courts till now, Maulvi Tamizaluddin has not received justice; High Court judges in trial case floating over corrupt files in trial court verdict: Nawaz Sharif courts Were, are, and still are. Now why “evacuated to Iqama instead of Panama” is like a perpetual disagreement with them and the people are listening to them but they are also on the path of justice system and now they are reformers of reform and justice system. The judicial reforms were an important part of his party’s manifesto in the 2018 elections.
Did PCO is a completely separate debate that has to be strengthened in the democratic systemile.
The PCO is a completely separate debate that has to be strengthened in the democratic system. As a result of the 1999 martial law, a dozen judges, unlike Justice Saeed Zaman Siddiqui, considered it ineffective to take the oath of dictator, but some high court judges stood up. There, rural judges such as Siddiqui, Nasir Aslam Zahid and Wajiuddin returned to their homes with their families, as senior jurists are sidelined in such ways, and fear fades every time. Experience and specialty seem to be in shock, and the currents of normality become blurred.
In the Zafar Ali Shah case, unlike justice, the judges also gave the military dictator the power to change the constitution which he did not even request. When Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry was ousted on March 9, 2007, he did not trust the Supreme Judicial Council and went to the Supreme Court for justice. Now Musharraf is also delivering justice and in Badi Nazar. They did not expect justice from the previous judiciary, or they will have to wait until their appeals are heard before they ever come to court. Macca’s traditions and unmanly clay powder experiences such as Raymond Davis have greatly damaged our system.
Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is once again under the torture of the court and repeated appearances are forming a political statement, Zardari Sahib, Mir Shakeel-ur-Rehman, the cabinet of the former government near half, and the closely regarded justice and justice system of justice. Apparently, and in line with NAB’s dangerous past, he is out on bail in case he gets tired after a while.
Why would not be wise to say it is a fair trial that meets the requirements of justice in the Pakistan
In such a situation, whether it be politicians or the media, a freelance freeware fair trial is all that is desired, but the trial that meets the test of Article 10A may not be impossible but difficult, in addition to the humor. Nothing can be found to be a deception, you can say that the media will divert attention from the problems, but it would not be wise to say it is a fair trial that meets the requirements of justice. A trial involving a prosecution and a judge videotaped, high-quality surveillance of the trial is also being done, a series of empirical trials and legal trials, no trustworthy action in any way, we have done before in the Prime Minister’s trial. Never leave behind imitation traditions We are still refugees in the shadow of our past.
There is no reason for the trial not to be a good one, it is a lack of judges, as well as a lack of command and control tension and unity among entertainers and prosecutors, and a real separation from each other’s department and a lot of mutual institutional communication. Is due to a major shortage. Prosecution procedures need immediate attention and improvement. First of all, Pakistan needs an independent police department with its own provincial and national directorate, an independent system of recruitment, surveillance and guidance, and training in it.
Recruit professional lawyers who have their own system and timely review of each case’s disease and weaknesses, the current system is highly unregulated and prosecutors are concerned about their good and bad investigations, and prosecutors are obliged to defend it even though it is free. Due to a poor investigation Unable to prove a crime, such cases would have been instituted
Political parties’ ideology of their own party influence the performance of factors such as promoting the rule of law.
Political parties’ ideology and ideological division of their own party influence the performance of factors such as promoting the rule of law, prosecuting and prosecuting free individuals that should not be compromised. Pakistan needs the State Prosecution Service to ensure free prosecution, monitor criminal investigations and keep the real fight against crime from flawed, inaccurate and unsafe investigative procedures, and to forward cases on which criminal convictions are ensured.
There are more possibilities to create. The legislative administration and the Law and Justice Commission must understand the need for an independent prosecution set-up for investigation and there is a dire need for policy-making decisions.Security requirements of the country are changing. We turn every day from the brink of war. This is the era of chemical weapons and cyber-attacks. Battles of these tanks are probably rare. Now is the time for a new way of giving gifts like dengue to the enemy. If ten corona patients enter your country, they are capable of causing as little damage as a small war.
Dealing with such risks is the real challenge. This requires modern posts. Even in terror cases, the proportion of those convicted is extremely low and dangerous, and military courts are by no means a complete or final solution.Niketa should also give law enforcement civilian wider powers of scrutiny that deal with major issues such as terrorism and support each other under an integrated mechanism to prevent attacks and if requested. In the event of attacks, detain and arrest those involved